Have You Seen What Dems Do To Their Own When They Misspeak?
What do you think they'll do to you if there is no way to stop their censorship industrial complex?
Just about everyone inside a Democrat-Majority captured industry or occupation is anywhere from reluctant to terrified to cross the party line. People done wrong by members of the political left who cross that line get destroyed by their own. This is not a theory but a fact. You may not leave the plantation unless kicked out, and that act follows some mortal sin against the approved narrative or its keepers.
Tara Reede, Michael Rectenwald, Bari Weiss, Uri Berliner, Catherine Herridge, RFKJ, and Tulsi, and any whistleblower or woman who comes forward to implicate a Democrat, Democratic institution, or party member will be pilloried, canceled, and destroyed if possible.
That’s what they do to one of their own when they step out of line.
Unions, public schools, universities, newsrooms, big tech, woke churches, banking, entertainment, Streaming services, churches (increasingly), government agencies - that long march through the institutions, as the commies like to say, and the last one left is the American Middle-Class and America itself, and they are close on that one.
A recent New York Times Opinion / Siena College Poll showed that more than half of those polled remained silent to avoid retaliation or criticism. 84% of those surveyed say this is a problem.
Loudonville, NY. Eighty-four percent of Americans say that some Americans not exercising their freedom of speech in everyday situations due to fear of retaliation or harsh criticism is either a very (40%) or somewhat (44%) serious problem, according to a new national New York Times Opinion/Siena College Poll. Over half, 55%, of Americans say that they have held their tongue, that is, not spoken freely over the last year because they were concerned about retaliation or harsh criticism…
Self-censorship is the goal.
Of the 55% of Americans that have not spoken freely, 57% are concerned about retaliation, 65% are concerned about being harshly criticized and 94% held their tongue to avoid conflict. Nearly a quarter of all Americans, 22%, reported restricting their freedom of expression for all three reasons.
You’d be hard-pressed to suggest this isn’t a problem for both sides because of one side - the Dems and a big-tech media machine at war with free speech.
That Word Does Not Mean What You Think It Means.
For the record, there is nothing Democratic about an apparatus that destroys its own for daring to have a different opinion and then speak it in public. Still, it does inform the reporting that shows the government leveraging its power to encourage censorship in the private sector. It reinforces repeated efforts by successive Democrat presidents to institute truth squads and disinformation ministries to control what information people see and hear. Then there is the cabal of industrial complexes that justify censorship as controlling disinformation and misinformation. And they are all members of the Democrat party - or beneficiaries of it - and fit the profile in paragraph one.
Their lives and livelihood are a product of a captured occupation, organization, or industry, and daring to speak any truth but the one approved by the narrative mills could end careers or even their lives (Seth Rich, Jeffry Epstein, a lot of people who knew the Clintons - and so on).
Lies must be protected and defended (at least) until their effect no longer threatens the accumulation of power. Hunter Biden's Laptop. Very Fine People. The Steel Dossier. Almost everything that comes from Hillary Clinton's or Rachel Maddow's mouth, and so on, and now Tim Walz. His elevation to a national race has exposed a career of utterances that range from misinformation to disinformation to flat-out lies meant to make him look good. His excuse is he's a knucklehead and that everyone speaks this way. Everyone you know in the Democrat industrial complex lies, or everyone everywhere (all of us)? And if that’s true and not unreasonable, then your party's war on it seems contrary to your vision of America.
But if everyone does it, and that’s bad, why do you deserve so much slack?
Struggle Sessions and Reeducation
The totalitarian solution is to inject approved partisan mediators to address the offending speech. If you are someone they might want to keep, you could be offered ‘counseling’ and the opportunity to recant. Issue a weeping apology and promise never to do it again.
Identified opposition will not be so fortunate. Whistleblowers or insiders who undermine the regime can expect harsh treatment. Early forms of these infringements on your natural rights include misinformation and disinformation agencies, rules, laws, and the intimidation, as mentioned above, of speech-focused platforms. History tells us that the path ends with threats, then arrest, loss of property, incarceration, and even death (suicide or a new unsolved murder no cold case officer will ever touch). No hyperbole. These tyrants are like all the others. There are no other tricks in the bag. You might get the opportunity to reform if your conversion has value, but don’t count on it.
Remember. They destroy their own on a whim now. With them in control, there is no future where this does not get worse.
That is their promise. They have not been shy about the need, only the consequence: once it’s gone (Free speech), you’ll never get it back.
It's not just when they misspeak. It also applies when they should tell an inconvenient truth.